|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1416
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 15:58:00 -
[1] - Quote
evereplicant wrote:ok ill say it again and ill keep saying it.
I agree with the OP. I am sick and tired of seeing large alliances taking every damn moon on the eve universe (yes thats including high sec and low sec) and then all they need to do is sit on them, anyone attacks them its 500 titans and supers defending it. Its WRONG and this is a massive issue with eve. Having all tech in venal also is just the biggest most stupid thing CCP have done.
There needs to be a complete overhaul of moon locations, a strategic review shall we say. Every region should have a pretty much equal amount of moons generating an equal amount of same type minerals.
Tech moons or any large income making moons should be very few say 10 per region and i still say they should be randomised every 3 months to new locations within the same region.
It stupid that people like goons can hold 150 high income moons and just make trillions.. its wrong very wrong and to be honest this is making me not want to play the game anymore.
redistribution (and god forbid, rotation) is a dumb idea
if you want to know why, i have 160k reasons a rogue goon |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1416
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 15:59:00 -
[2] - Quote
double posting this nonsense doesn't add validity to it a rogue goon |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1416
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 16:00:00 -
[3] - Quote
also tell me all about large alliances taking all the moons in highsec a rogue goon |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1421
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 18:09:00 -
[4] - Quote
Ezra Tair wrote:Nirnias Stirrum wrote:Have you tried taking the moons for yourself? Cause i can guarantee thats how goons did it. As I recall, they had a entire region given to them.
unlike defiant legacy, a noted relevant space holding alliance
we had deklein given to us because we merged with the alliance that previously owned it, we only had 10-20 tech moons and we had to take the other 40-60 ourselves a rogue goon |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1421
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 18:11:00 -
[5] - Quote
Victoria Sin wrote:Richard Desturned wrote: redistribution (and god forbid, rotation) is a dumb idea
if you want to know why, i have 160k reasons
Making it fade in/out is a good idea. Anyway you said you have 160K reasons, but then you didn't post a single one. Wtf?
160k refers to the number of accessible moons in the game that can have moon mining POSes anchored on them
i'm sure t2 prices will not be affected in the slightest by everyone having to scan moons every few months
(they will, i hope you enjoy 3b isk hulks) a rogue goon |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1421
|
Posted - 2012.07.25 18:14:00 -
[6] - Quote
Hrothgar Nilsson wrote:Out of curiosity, does the Federation in Goonswarm Federation come from Tau Ceti Federation?
I remember reading about the RedSwarm Federation, seems each part came from a different alliance that was a part of the coalition.
Red Alliance Goonswarm Tau Ceti Federation
Same case with GSF?
that is correct a rogue goon |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1434
|
Posted - 2012.07.26 00:25:00 -
[7] - Quote
Tarsus Zateki wrote:Dear CCP,
Why did you put a bunch of valuable resources in one spot? My frightened pubbie mind can't handle the thought of resource motivated warfare and diplomacy. Please spread the technitium out so that everyone can have a fare an equitable share.
Signed,
Pubbie Filth
"additionally, we want to mine tech moons in hisec" a rogue goon |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1486
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 12:45:00 -
[8] - Quote
Lady Zarrina wrote:So the big reason to not to redistribute moons is because some people have a database of current moons and they don't want to make a new one..... I hope to GOD they are not serious. Talk about afraid of change. I don't scan moons, but if it is truly that bad, ask that it is improved. Ohhhhhh wait, then it will be easy for others to make a database or the database pointless.
Adapt. Nothing wrong with a little unknown. Or does that scare you.
"i, who have never scanned a moon, have valuable insight on moon scanning" EVE Online: Trammel (or NGE) |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1486
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 12:59:00 -
[9] - Quote
i have another great idea
all sov in the game should drop every three months so ~small alliances~ can get a chance EVE Online: Trammel (or NGE) |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1487
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 13:28:00 -
[10] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Lady Zarrina wrote:Again, just cause you want to know about every moon, doesn't mean you need to know about every moon. These numbers are meaningless and at best spread across all of null/low sec.
But again, there is the fear factor of the unknown. Null sec is running scared :) Why is it better to randomly redistribute the bottleneck product than to fix the bottleneck.
because publords think that they will get a chance at a personal tech moon EVE Online: Trammel (or NGE) |
|

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1487
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 13:41:00 -
[11] - Quote
Pipa Porto wrote:Phill Esteen wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Lady Zarrina wrote:Sounds like moon scanning needs to be improved. Got an idea for how to improve it? Remove it, put moon resources into the database dump instead. After that no-one will be permitted to complain about null-sec being stagnant. I think that's a terrible idea from a lore perspective, but a wonderful idea from a humanitarian perspective.
moon scanning is tedious, but not a huge PITA otherwise
however, whoever designed POS management should face charges for crimes against humanity EVE Online: Trammel (or NGE) |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1490
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 14:09:00 -
[12] - Quote
Big Bossu wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Lady Zarrina wrote:So afraid of unknown. We might not be mining the most profitable moon..... Oh no. I need to know I am playing eve right (by the spreadsheet). Sigh. Minimum 5300 Man hours every time it shuffles. And I made enough assumptions that I'd be comfortable quadrupling that to get a reasonable estimate. Then comes moving POSes around. Have you ever set up or taken down a Deathstar POS? Moon scanning is also necessary to plan your attacks on a new region. So every time someone invades someone else's space that they haven't held before, you have scouts hunting down moons. 0.0 Region has like average of 80 systems. 40 moons is roughly average per system. That would take roughly 2 hours per system. Seeing how large 0.0 alliances are, this really isn't that much effort.
yeah because every character in a given 0.0 alliance is an individual player EVE Online: Trammel (or NGE) |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1490
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 14:10:00 -
[13] - Quote
Lady Zarrina wrote:Pipa Porto wrote:Lady Zarrina wrote:Phill Esteen wrote:Many years ago I scanned one constellation for moon materials, probably less than 150 moons in total.
I was only deinstitutionalized very recently and I am still kept under close supervision for my own safety. Sounds like moon scanning needs to be improved. Got an idea for how to improve it? Well allow people to scan moons faster seems to be the solution. I keep hearing how long it takes. So allow scanning of multiple moons (by planet, system or constellation for instance). Or perhaps have special probes, consumed on use, which allows scan from anywhere in the system. Speeding up scanning should be easy. But I should not be the one to improve the system. But the arguments I hear against redistribution just seem weak at best. Yours was actually the best i heard, just plainly asking what would it fix. And, I don't think it is the end all, be all, of a solution, but could be part of the solution. Makes it more challenging to control vast portions of the high value resources. I believe there should be economic reasons to help incite conflict, but we have seen highly concentrated high value resources can lead to its own issues.
give me a good argument for redistributiom EVE Online: Trammel (or NGE) |

Richard Desturned
GoonWaffe Goonswarm Federation
1491
|
Posted - 2012.07.28 14:27:00 -
[14] - Quote
Lady Zarrina wrote: But serious, I think if you read my post you may find a few reasons. And I still see fear of unknown as your sole reason against it. As I am sure we can speed up the process.
i meant a good reason
forgive me if it wasn't clear enough EVE Online: Trammel (or NGE) |
|
|
|